stonechalice wrote:I assume so. What really peeves me is this has been happening since Modern Warfare seven years ago, and the developers stand by and do nothing. It honestly makes me sick. In a game where competition is fierce, in one of the biggest videogame franchises in history, your name on a leaderboard means nothing. Absolutely nothing. It's disgusting. It's even more comical as they're really gunning for the whole 'esports' thing at the moment. What kind of chance do they have to make it a legitimate competition when you've got this kind of nonsense?
Blue Swirl wrote:CoD is 4v4, unless you count the coaches. Knight is right, they also tend to play round based game types, such as SnD, CTF and Hardpoint. It'll be interesting to see if they move to Ghosts (MLG have been doing some test/exhibition tournaments) or stick with BlOps II.
afgavinstan wrote:I got a copy of MW3 for a buzz on 360. If anyone wants to come and help a relative noob (not played since the week of MW's launch), gimme a shout.
Knight wrote:They'll move I'd have thought. Unless loads of the features included in BlOps for the competitive side aren't in GhostsBlue Swirl wrote:CoD is 4v4, unless you count the coaches. Knight is right, they also tend to play round based game types, such as SnD, CTF and Hardpoint. It'll be interesting to see if they move to Ghosts (MLG have been doing some test/exhibition tournaments) or stick with BlOps II.
stonechalice wrote:Ok fair enough. I still don't see why casual players should get the bum deal with hacked leaderboards though. What really grinds my gears is that the issue is never addressed or acknowledged. I have a friend who is us up near the top of those shitty leaderboards, and he plays as fair as anyone, but it means nothing to anyone because for all anybody else knows, he's a hacker.
daviedigi wrote:the optic mlg team have a few you tube vids up saying theres no competitive modes at all!Knight wrote:They'll move I'd have thought. Unless loads of the features included in BlOps for the competitive side aren't in Ghosts
I_R wrote:Call of Duty series enters three-year dev cycle Sledgehammer joining the roster of developers. I can't tell if this is Activision getting smart or an act of desperation. Hopefully it catches on though, the two year development cycle hasn't been a good thing.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!