equinox_code wrote:Pleased popular opinion has finally caught up to this franchise being shit. In fact it's so shit that i'm often coerced into overlooking how utterly awesome the first Modern Warfare was at the time
three1ne wrote:It's gaming's equivalent to the Transformers Movies. Big dumb action and the COD series does it well. Except, this time, there is a noticeable lack of polish/budget.equinox_code wrote:Pleased popular opinion has finally caught up to this franchise being shit. In fact it's so shit that i'm often coerced into overlooking how utterly awesome the first Modern Warfare was at the time
Blue Swirl wrote:I think the hardcore fans and the developers are getting fatigued with the series; for the former, buying a full price game every 12 months, all the DLC, stumping up for Elite membership, etc., is getting tiresome, and for the latter there's only so much innovation you can do within the CoD framework before you either run out of ideas or do something to ruin how it plays. I think this is going to end up going the way of the plastic instrument music games; too much too fast, so people get put off and it dies out. I doubt Activision will care, though...
JMW wrote:I must have said this a thousand times now, but for local splitscreen MP FPS CoD rules, nothing else comes close.
JMW wrote:It's a zombies replacement of sorts, but the no1 that's not there is SpecOps, that's the main one.
Aye. I have no problem with paid DLC but the prices for a handful of maps are disgusting, yet people blindly gobble them up year after year after year.Diluted Dante wrote:Because they charge a tenner for each map pack, so you save a fiver. 1200 points a pack did always seem a rip to me.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!