beano wrote:Good man Mal'.
Phew.Liveinadive wrote:Streets of Rage2 I thought of that but it's '92. Edit: '93 Eu, dammit too many games
Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
fullspectrum wrote:Streets of Rage is a poor man's Final Fight. Sorry but it just is
Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
fullspectrum wrote:Played it through with Cosby the other day (FF). I think I enjoyed it more than him.Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
hylian_elf wrote:I asked my MD owning friend over the weekend about SoR. He said they were a bit better than other games in the genre, but ultimately still shallow and repetitive brawlers. His opinion and all, but I guess I'm back to having no desire whatsoever to play the series. Just listen to the music instead.Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
I know you love dat Metro City but... I'm sorry, Nick.fullspectrum wrote:Streets of Rage is a poor man's Final Fight. Sorry but it just is.
tigerswiftly wrote:I know you love dat Metro City but... I'm sorry, Nick. Final Fight = Street Fighter. Streets of Rage = Street Fighter 2. They took the core idea of Final Fight and, um, made it better in every respect. Hylian, I played the SORemake the other week. It's amazing (despite some shonky vehicle levels) and plays really well in co-op. Shout outs to Golden Axe which has a special place in my heart, but it wasn't in the same league as SOR. That genre was so good.fullspectrum wrote:Streets of Rage is a poor man's Final Fight. Sorry but it just is.
Yossarian wrote:And SoR2 for comparison?fullspectrum wrote:Played it through with Cosby the other day (FF). I think I enjoyed it more than him.Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
tigerswiftly wrote:I know you love dat Metro City but... I'm sorry, Nick. Final Fight = Street Fighter. Streets of Rage = Street Fighter 2. They took the core idea of Final Fight and, um, made it better in every respect. Hylian, I played the SORemake the other week. It's amazing (despite some shonky vehicle levels) and plays really well in co-op. Shout outs to Golden Axe which has a special place in my heart, but it wasn't in the same league as SOR. That genre was so good.fullspectrum wrote:Streets of Rage is a poor man's Final Fight. Sorry but it just is.
Played that recently too. Was decent.regmcfly wrote:Cadillacs and Dinosaurs Drops mic
hylian_elf wrote:Re: SoR2. I promised myself I would play it after the last time Yoss and I got into this debate. Then recently I read the RetroGamer best-MD-games article where SoR2 came top, and they did such a terrible job of trying to make the game sound good. Then my mate. I'll try and put some time in soon so that I can see for myself.
fullspectrum wrote:No but I appreciate it had special moves which is pretty cool. My sentiment is based on just that, sentimentality, but the art/music/characters/attitude of FF wins all day.Yossarian wrote:And SoR2 for comparison?fullspectrum wrote:Played it through with Cosby the other day (FF). I think I enjoyed it more than him.Yossarian wrote:Have you played both games recently? Final Fight has got about as much depth as tiddlywinks.
JonB wrote:We went through a load of scrolling beat 'em ups a few weeks ago in the retro thread. They all suffer to some extent with repetitiveness, but SoR2 is least bad offender and overall the daddy by some distance. I remember how impressed I was when I first saw FF in an arcade, but it's aged badly and is pretty basic in comparison.
fullspectrum wrote:Like? (Yoss)
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!