Raiziel wrote:The developers will figure that out.
Raiziel wrote:Why not?
Mod74 wrote:
Yes. That's been in the back of my mind since they showed it last year. There were also features like holding the touch screen up in front of the TV to reveal hidden stuff, and that's just not possible when you switch to the 1 screen option. I mean, either games have to have 2 separate modes, which makes the 2nd screen stuff optional (and therefore more prone to throwaway gimmicks), or you're encouraging developers to only make some of their games exploit the features, so that people will choose them when the TV's not available. At the very least it's an awkward concept.Mod74 wrote:I think maybe people have missed Elm's point here. If you're playing a game that uses the touch screen for interactions. What happens to the touch screen bit when you start streaming the main game to the touch screen? It gets shrunk to a small square at the bottom? Good luck reading/pressing that. The touch interactions are moved to a pause screen? That might prove awkward for games that ask you to use both at the same time.Elmlea wrote:I don't get this either. Â The whole "use it as a second screen" thing sort of becomes impossible if you switch it to "wife watching Corrie" mode, doesn't it?regmcfly wrote:Or in place of a tv, for example, if mrs reg is wanting to watch something?
See this sounds great. But if you think about it, you're probably going to be pausing most games to have a look through. In which case, its probably more convenient to have the info on a single screen.Ârevelthedog wrote:I would love to see something like Dark Souls on this with a constant inventory screen on the remote. that would be cool.
Raiziel wrote:The world would be a poorer place if they did.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!