tin_robot wrote:Cam After watching this my wife asked me what she knew Madeline Brewer from, so we looked it up on IMDB (Handmaid's Tale). As a result I then fell down a rabbit hole of reading user reviews, and being reminded that, once again, I'm largely out of tune with the rest of the world. Based on those reviews it's a film aimed at teenage boys that doesn't have a proper ending, doesn't make any sense and is a waste of 90 minutes. Whereas I really liked it. This is maybe all the more surprising given that I guess it technically also sits in the "slow burn psychological horror" column. It's a film about a cam-girl who finds that her identity has been stolen by an apparent online doppelganger. The film does a good job of establishing "Lola's" world, and is that rare instance of a movie in which a sex worker is depicted as, well, a normal human being. (Rather than either a criminal or a victim.) I genuinely don't understand complaints that it makes no sense, and if anything I would have preferred it to make less sense.Ultimately it's a film about identity and self determination as much as it's a film about sex workers or creepy doppelgangers. It's cleverer and more thoughtful than it appears at first blush - though I appreciate I may be the only one who thinks so.Spoiler:
Blocks100 wrote:Currently watching RoboCop the remake and and I can't put my finger on it but something's not quite right is it? I mean it should work, it's a stellar cast and there are one or two memorable set pieces - but did they really think they could eclipse the original in any way shape or form? I mean really, what was the point of even trying?
Kow wrote:I thought the last shot was the icing on the cake.
Spoiler:
Tempy wrote:tin_robot wrote:Cam After watching this my wife asked me what she knew Madeline Brewer from, so we looked it up on IMDB (Handmaid's Tale). As a result I then fell down a rabbit hole of reading user reviews, and being reminded that, once again, I'm largely out of tune with the rest of the world. Based on those reviews it's a film aimed at teenage boys that doesn't have a proper ending, doesn't make any sense and is a waste of 90 minutes. Whereas I really liked it. This is maybe all the more surprising given that I guess it technically also sits in the "slow burn psychological horror" column. It's a film about a cam-girl who finds that her identity has been stolen by an apparent online doppelganger. The film does a good job of establishing "Lola's" world, and is that rare instance of a movie in which a sex worker is depicted as, well, a normal human being. (Rather than either a criminal or a victim.) I genuinely don't understand complaints that it makes no sense, and if anything I would have preferred it to make less sense.Ultimately it's a film about identity and self determination as much as it's a film about sex workers or creepy doppelgangers. It's cleverer and more thoughtful than it appears at first blush - though I appreciate I may be the only one who thinks so.Spoiler:
Don't worry, you're not alone. I absolutely loved it and remembered arguing to the hilt for it on here when it first dropped, but that's a long time ago now and it's lost a few hundred pages back.
Edit:I've spent half an hour looking for this stuff and can't find it.
RamSteelwood wrote:In a completely different category of film to those Tin discusses...
I watched Hobbs and Shaw the other night. it was probably even sillier and more over the top than i expected. two thumbs up!
yourfavouriteuncle wrote:The Sisters Brothers is one of the best books of the last 20 years. It’s incredible. The film knows this and aims to capture it’s tine and mood and does this well. It makes for a slightly less brilliant film though.
regmcfly wrote:I'm not normally a big lad exploding everything it's cobra 2021 let's go guy, but Hobbs and Shaw is a great movie I'd give 5 stars to.
Cosby wrote:yourfavouriteuncle wrote:The Sisters Brothers is one of the best books of the last 20 years. It’s incredible. The film knows this and aims to capture it’s tine and mood and does this well. It makes for a slightly less brilliant film though.
I'll have to pick that up. I enjoyed the film but similar to others, something just didn't sit quite right with it. Almost like the separate strands weren't really designed to be woven together. The Gyllenhaal and Ahmed piece felt out of place at times but probably would've enjoyed a film about their story alone.
Moot_Geeza wrote:Cosby wrote:yourfavouriteuncle wrote:The Sisters Brothers is one of the best books of the last 20 years. It’s incredible. The film knows this and aims to capture it’s tine and mood and does this well. It makes for a slightly less brilliant film though.
I'll have to pick that up. I enjoyed the film but similar to others, something just didn't sit quite right with it. Almost like the separate strands weren't really designed to be woven together. The Gyllenhaal and Ahmed piece felt out of place at times but probably would've enjoyed a film about their story alone.
I just bought it, had to after a recommendation like that. The film hit the right spot for me, I thought it was the best modern western since....Meek's Cutoff? I'm possibly forgetting something in between.
mistercrayon wrote:Would you consider the book a sci fi?
I remember reading the book and I think from the trailer it seemed more goofy than how I read the book. I found it funny the height of decadence was brushing teeth.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!