FranticPea wrote:Too much pessimism for my liking on the forum at the moment. Believe Iain. BELIEVE.
adkm1979 wrote:Yup. Â As Turts said, Forza physics in an open world is an interesting prospect. Â As it stands I'm not sure why they're trading on the Forza name here. Â I can't see that the brand is so solid, so well known that it will sufficiently boost sales to make up for the damage it will do amongst purist fans.
Jim won't like it.
afgavinstan wrote:Race Pro lol.
Ali wrote:"Everything you hit gets you points". I'm out.
Ali wrote:Watch the Gametrailers video. It says that at 0:56, or words to that effect. Â As the weird bloke crashes into fences and roadsigns and gets points. Plastered all over the screen. Why did MS feel the need to make Forza Not-As-Good-As-Burnout? It was fine as it was.
I'd prefer it if they used a different name or if they insist on using Forza then that should drop to being just a catch-all name with the emphasis placed more on the secondary part of the title, the bit that is the actual meat of the title.Mod74 wrote:Um, so the only games allowed to bear the Forza name are the bi-annual sims? Why shouldn't they do different styles of racer under the same brand a la Need for Speed, Dirt, Ridge Racer?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!