At first. Â Once your brain adjusts, you don't really notice. Â Eating patterns can be reset. Â The odd black coffee/green tea staves any pangs.weadre wrote:re: fasting Don't you get realy hungry? Or is that part of the fun?
weadre wrote:re: fasting Don't you get realy hungry? Or is that part of the fun?
superflyninja wrote:im currently on a pancake making buzz. nothing fancy just topped with sugar,freshly squeezed lemon.
SpaceGazelle wrote:I only felt hungry on the first fast day. I fully expected to wake up ravenous the following morning but was surprised to feel absolutely fine. I just had a cup of tea and finally ate some yoghurt with honey about midday. When you do eat again you eat more slowly and considered. Your body just seems to want something light. My plan was to pig out on the non-fasting days but that didn't happen at all. I eat less meat now and more veg and fruit. I'm not actively trying to be healthy but my brain seems to have changed the way I do everything. Everyone's noticed it. I highly recommend you try it for a few of weeks. Watch this.re: fasting Don't you get realy hungry? Or is that part of the fun?
Very interesting. Â What isn't taken into account is adopting an IF regimen while training (in my case weight training). Â Also, the notion that you can eat whatever you want on eating days is folly. Â There are many ways to implement IF, he and his followers tried a few similar variations, some people didn't benefit and suddenly he proclaims it a sham? Â Bollocks. Â I and others here do it to good effect and suffer none of those problems. Â Berkhan would not be impressed.beano wrote:
Skerret wrote:Further furthermore, that article is over four years old. Â IF is more or less accepted now. Â Article is rot, in part.
Ahar, I misinterpreted your read deep to mean the reverse, i.e. see the folly of fasting, heathens, through this article. Â I expect I thought this due to the initial dumb comment, thus colouring me view. Â In hindsight this would have required you not reading the comments section and you're no fool. Â My criticism above is aimed purely at the article and its author, not you wot posted it. Â I don't really think you're dumb Beano, quite the opposite. Â I'll think more, rant less in future eh.beano wrote:I know how old it is. Just someone mentioned the BBC thing, Horizon. And I thought it was misleading as it portrayed it as groundbreaking, revolutionary and new. I did say read deep. I thought you would've understood the phrase. I see the evidence for CR and IF. I agree with most of it. It's just dumb for me because I personally don't like it. Can we get back to each to their own? xSkerret wrote:Further furthermore, that article is over four years old. Â IF is more or less accepted now. Â Article is rot, in part.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!