In a nutshell, milk is like most other mass produced products in that it has been nutritionally diminished in the pursuit of cost and convenience. Organic is a good alternative but there good and not so good since organic became fashionable. If you can find organic unhomogenised milk from smallish producers, grab it. It's likely to be produced more ethically (both in terms of animal welfare and additives to the product itself), tastes a fuckton better (dat rich creamy cap) and has a superior nutritional profile. The pasteurisation process denatures the proteins in milk and smaller producers tend to pasteurize at lower temperatures. Raw milk is king but as Beano can testify to it's hard to source legally over there. I get 4 litres of raw milk a week and it's amazing stuff, so rich. I attribute my ongoing fine health at least partially to the stuff. When it gets close to use by, instead of going sour it becomes almost cheesy and tangy. Great for making kefir too.GooberTheHat wrote:I'm off red meat now, not completely but it will be consumed only once or twice a month, and cuttingback on carbs (again). I'm sure you have knowledge of this sort of thing @skerret as it sounds like you take a lot of care over what you eat. In a nutshell what are the problems with ordinary milk, and is organic milk a good alternative or should I steer clear of mass produced dairy completely?
fullspectrum wrote:The MF guys have levelled up a great deal I feel. Wow. I can easily see myself going to the corner of their catchment area and waiting for it. Where did you read it dude?
Skerret wrote:I heard a woman at a cafe ask for a skinny iced chocolate the other day and it made me want to do murders.
Got me a bit worried though.Before pasteurisation, raw milk had associated health risks. Tuberculosis and Brucellosis were found in many herds at the time, and these diseases could be passed on through the milk. Also, the actual milking process was very basic allowing contaminants into the milk that contained bad bacteria such as E.coli. So there were problems many years ago.
Gonzo wrote:Fuck milk off after the age of 26, says I.,
That's a bit misleading and a key phrase is 'many years ago'. The reason milk is heat treated is because large scale milk operations draw milk from herds and farms all over and pool it. Given one bad batch could contaminate the milk and quality control on that scale is difficult and costly, they need to heat treat it. The beauty of small farms is that they likely have their own herd that they have precise control over and can test for such things given the much smaller volume. Fear mongering about raw milk is just that; the stuff that could be contaminated is always pasteurised and the same concerns don't apply to small farms because they have far greater capacity for quality control. I've been having it for years now, litres a week, and never had an issue. It's labeled as bath milk because you still can't legally sell raw milk for consumption, but they know every pine who buys it drinks the stuff.GooberTheHat wrote:http://www.hookandson.co.uk/ http://gazegillorganics.co.uk Thoses two look promising @beano This bitGot me a bit worried though.Before pasteurisation, raw milk had associated health risks. Tuberculosis and Brucellosis were found in many herds at the time, and these diseases could be passed on through the milk. Also, the actual milking process was very basic allowing contaminants into the milk that contained bad bacteria such as E.coli. So there were problems many years ago.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!