optimark_prime wrote:You need to take into account the host hardware, to a point, but a good game is a good game, regardless.
Mario Galaxy was one of my favourite games, I don't think it benefitted from being on Wii, it'd have been equally good on GameCube.
WorKid wrote:[I'd disagree on the Galaxy point, I think the contols improved the game, plus the GC couldn't have delivered a game that looked, or even sounded, as gorgeous.
AJ wrote:Oh, was there actually a bump in specs from the GC to Wii? I thought it was the exact same thing.
optimark_prime wrote:My point about Galaxy, was that it didn't really utilise motion controls to any great degree. Which was obviously the Wii's key selling point. The game may have looked/sounded slightly worse on GC, but wouldn't have suffered in the way it played.
optimark_prime wrote:My point about Galaxy, was that it didn't really utilise motion controls to any great degree.
igorgetmeabrain wrote:I prefer the Wii control method for every single game in which you can choose. It's vastly superior in MP, Pikmin and Zelda for a start and one of the most appealing aspects of the SMGs was the way in which the Wii controls were used to give a greater tactility to the games.
hylian_elf wrote:Not an Edge 10?! How disappointing.
WorKid wrote:They did (rather ridiculously) call it the most next-gen game of 2013 though.hylian_elf wrote:Not an Edge 10?! How disappointing.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!