I agree that the final third isnt nearly as good but they could end at S&O and be one of the best ever made.hylian_elf wrote:I prefer my games not to have a dull final third.
hylian_elf wrote:I prefer my games not to have a dull final third.
LivDiv wrote:I agree that the final third isnt nearly as good but they could end at S&O and be one of the best ever made. The second half is lore strong mind and it is after S&O that PvP really opens up. I wish they had done more with the remaster, actually finished The Bed of Chaos etc.hylian_elf wrote:I prefer my games not to have a dull final third.
Djornson wrote:Look at us splitting votes like lib dems and greens, we should have got together and combined forces
Bob wrote:[]ive got a mint og Model
I can sell you cheap to
A badger
This is exactly right. You can see its influence all the way to Zelda BotW.LivDiv wrote:I cant see past Dark Souls. For a start I really enjoyed it, which helps. It was the most disruptive game to the media that did so in a positive way. It redefines how we consider difficulty in games while still remaining open to multiple solutions to challenges. "The Dark Souls of..." has become so over used it has become cliche, I dont think that applies to any other game despite the rise of the Battle Royale genre. I think it pulled AAA gaming back from Michael Bay popcorn fluff and offered something more tactical with complex, deep and mysterious lore. Even it's multiplayer was totally unique (except Demons of course), totally fitting to the gameplay and the lore. A fantastic achievement.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!