And scorsese and Spielberg and Bay and Wong Kar Wai and Nolan and Van Sant and Errol Morris and Ken BurnsSpaceGazelle wrote:I just think it's a little too distinct. Yes most directors have a style but this is more an over-style and it's pretty much relentless. I gets a bit, I dunno, sickly?
regmcfly wrote:And scorsese and Spielberg and Bay and Wong Kar Wai and Nolan and Van Sant and Errol Morris and Ken Burns They all need to sit doon too, right?I just think it's a little too distinct. Yes most directors have a style but this is more an over-style and it's pretty much relentless. I gets a bit, I dunno, sickly?
Ken Burns docs don't count.
regmcfly wrote:Interesting. Documentarians are exempt from "same-ness"?Ken Burns docs don't count.
RedDave2 wrote:I'd understand the critique more if Anderson didn't have such a clear style. Like it or not, it's always clear when you are watching one of WAs movies. To some this might make his movies samey but if knowing he is the director is what's colouring your view of those movies, maybe that's as much of you.
regmcfly wrote:That's not what I was saying. Let me give it back to you. Baseball should be treated exactly the same way as the Civil War aye?
SpaceGazelle wrote:regmcfly wrote:That's not what I was saying. Let me give it back to you. Baseball should be treated exactly the same way as the Civil War aye?
Well the idea of a doc is to just tell the truth isn't it? There are only so many ways to jazz it up but I agree the tone could be a little different depending on the subject matter.
SpaceGazelle wrote:I think we're getting a little off the point here but agree with Senna (once I'd googled hagiography) and I don't even like vroom vroom cars.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!