TheDJR wrote:The soundtrack to this looks amazing, you should listen to it Bob.
MoesTavern wrote:Anyone else have this? Reviews are shitting on it.
danclarke wrote:I was in Game on Sunday and saw a lot of people buying this - can't fathom how anyone could pick up a game without seeing any kind of review first.
acemuzzy wrote:Is there a metametacritic? Eg what's the average average score? I'm guessing over 50. I'm guessing there's a trend towards positivity in the press that skews what 67 means.
But I'm guessing, obvs.
retroking1981 wrote:75+ is regarded as positive. Forget where the negative/mediocre number is.acemuzzy wrote:Is there a metametacritic? Eg what's the average average score? I'm guessing over 50. I'm guessing there's a trend towards positivity in the press that skews what 67 means. But I'm guessing, obvs.
Bob wrote:Sounds pretty much like the only problem is asset and mission recycling and maybe being a bit meat and potatoes game play wise, possibly made up for by the atmosphere and story.
trippy wrote:Bob wrote:Sounds pretty much like the only problem is asset and mission recycling and maybe being a bit meat and potatoes game play wise, possibly made up for by the atmosphere and story.
That and the metric fucktonne of bugs. Did you watch the video up there? Undermines the atmosphere and serious story a wee bit.
I hoped this would be good and have been hearing some positive things but it looks like it needs a patch or twelve.
Skondo wrote:What are the main differences between 2 and 3 Bob? As I said on the previous page, 2 is dreadful, but I really enjoyed it.
Paul the sparky wrote:Good post there Bob, I think that makes it one in a row.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!