stonechalice wrote:I've got a risotto cooker.
Risotto on a flat rock? Do you know how liquid interacts with gravity?djchump wrote:Frying pans are so unnecessary. All right-minded non-morons use a flat rock with hot fire underneath.
That's not true. I look forward to your posts and miss you when you're gone.Spock wrote:I went away for ages and none of you GAVE A SHIT!!! *blubbers uncontrollably into ornate 'kerchief
Risotto is unnecessary. All not insane people simply grab the rice plants and shove then in their mouths raw.Yossarian wrote:Risotto on a flat rock? Do you know how liquid interacts with gravity?djchump wrote:Frying pans are so unnecessary. All right-minded non-morons use a flat rock with hot fire underneath.
Talking of stopping and considering things for a moment, might you be taking this a little too seriously?Yossarian wrote:Rice is essentially, if not actually, indigestible when it's raw. This is about the third or fourth time that you've proffered one of these reductionist 'not using a rice cooker is equivalent to X' when X is a completely ridiculous comparison that bears no relation to the pointlessness or otherwise of rice cookers at all. If you were to stop for a moment and consider why it is that you can't compare it to something that's genuinely useful without the flaw in your comparison being pointed out immediately, then you might just be in line for an epiphany.
It'd probably look fairly similar, but I'd be deriving a lot less enjoyment from it.JonB wrote:Then I dread to think what it would be like if you were.
Brooks wrote:This is a sketch though.
I mean it has to be.
Prove it.Yossarian wrote:Rice is essentially, if not actually, indigestible when it's raw.
Well, la-di-da, look at you Mr. Fancy-Pants-Hot-Flat-Rock-Isn't-Good-Enough-For-Me, with your non-raw cooked rice, la-di-da-di-da, yeah, sure, let's all stop for a moment and consider completely ridiculous arguments eh, la-di-da. I bet you wear clothes as well, Mr. Fancy-Pants-String-And-Leaves-Aren't-Good-Enough-For-Me.Yossarian wrote:This is about the third or fourth time that you've proffered one of these reductionist 'not using a rice cooker is equivalent to X' when X is a completely ridiculous comparison that bears no relation to the pointlessness or otherwise of rice cookers at all. If you were to stop for a moment and consider why it is that you can't compare it to something that's genuinely useful without the flaw in your comparison being pointed out immediately, then you might just be in line for an epiphany.
There isn't a lot of call for Tarzan impersonators in London.Diluted Dante wrote:So you're too good for jobs which you can do in string and leaves then?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!