I was wondering when someone was going to point that out. Â Yes, it is biased but the things it mentions do actually happen. Â It was a nice quick way to point out that palm oil is not good. Â The loss of habitat is of particular concern.
There are possible benefits to be derived from palm oil, cancer treatment being one, but it's mainly used a cheap cooking oil and ingredient in shitty biscuits and whatnot.
Skerret's posting is ok to trip balls to and read just to experience the ambience but don't expect any content. "I'm jealous of sucking major dick!"~ Kernowgaz
They'd get a serious fuck punching yes. Â However, time is marking/money and I can't be arsed educating at this time of night. Â Educate yourself, I'm sleepy.
Edit: fuck punched.
Skerret's posting is ok to trip balls to and read just to experience the ambience but don't expect any content. "I'm jealous of sucking major dick!"~ Kernowgaz
Because there's been some silliness without any substance about something and now you're promoting something on the back of that which is also a something without any thing. Jeez.Â
I know Skez's article wasn't exactly authoritative, but it does appear to be a pretty contentious issue that's been the subject of campaigns by various environmental groups, not least Greenpeace.
Given that a sustainable alternative is available, seems prudent to go with it.